Alkhai · Sample findings
14:32BANKLoan approvals taking 5 days → reduced to 2.1 days·14:30OPS22% of orders delayed → reduced to 6%·14:28FIN$3.2M stuck in rework → unlocked·14:27FIN$2.8M tied up in approval queues·14:25FINInvoice cycle delays impacting cash conversion·14:23PROC17% of purchase orders bypassing preferred vendors·14:21BANKCompliance review adding 3.2 days per application·14:19OPS35% of workload concentrated on 8% of staff·14:17FINWorking capital locked in WIP longer than booked·14:15PROC1 in 4 invoices reworked before payment·14:26FLOW64% of cycle time stuck in one step·14:24OPSRework happening 3× more than expected·14:22FLOWApprovals delayed after 4 PM daily·14:20FLOWTop 2 steps causing 80% of delays·14:18CASERegional bank → +18% throughput in 6 weeks·14:16CASELogistics firm → cut delays by 31%·14:14CASEInsurance ops → $1.2M annual savings identified·14:12MFGChangeover dwell 42m → 31m · 5-shift rolling avg·14:08BANKOnboarding cycle time 14d → 5d · zero audit findings·14:06FLOW47% of cases following a non-standard path·14:04OPSProcess conforming to SOP only 31% of the time·14:02WMSWave dispatch missing SLA dropped 12% → 3.4%·14:00CASEMid-market manufacturer → +19% line throughput in 8 weeks·13:58CASE3PL → expedited shipments down 31% · no new headcount·13:56ALERTRe-queue rate spiking on loan-approval workflow·13:52FINWorking capital tied in inventory · $4.7M → $4.1M·13:50OPSHandoff Ops → Compliance averaging 1.4 days·14:32BANKLoan approvals taking 5 days → reduced to 2.1 days·14:30OPS22% of orders delayed → reduced to 6%·14:28FIN$3.2M stuck in rework → unlocked·14:27FIN$2.8M tied up in approval queues·14:25FINInvoice cycle delays impacting cash conversion·14:23PROC17% of purchase orders bypassing preferred vendors·14:21BANKCompliance review adding 3.2 days per application·14:19OPS35% of workload concentrated on 8% of staff·14:17FINWorking capital locked in WIP longer than booked·14:15PROC1 in 4 invoices reworked before payment·14:26FLOW64% of cycle time stuck in one step·14:24OPSRework happening 3× more than expected·14:22FLOWApprovals delayed after 4 PM daily·14:20FLOWTop 2 steps causing 80% of delays·14:18CASERegional bank → +18% throughput in 6 weeks·14:16CASELogistics firm → cut delays by 31%·14:14CASEInsurance ops → $1.2M annual savings identified·14:12MFGChangeover dwell 42m → 31m · 5-shift rolling avg·14:08BANKOnboarding cycle time 14d → 5d · zero audit findings·14:06FLOW47% of cases following a non-standard path·14:04OPSProcess conforming to SOP only 31% of the time·14:02WMSWave dispatch missing SLA dropped 12% → 3.4%·14:00CASEMid-market manufacturer → +19% line throughput in 8 weeks·13:58CASE3PL → expedited shipments down 31% · no new headcount·13:56ALERTRe-queue rate spiking on loan-approval workflow·13:52FINWorking capital tied in inventory · $4.7M → $4.1M·13:50OPSHandoff Ops → Compliance averaging 1.4 days·
Solution / 04

Targeted Automation

Automation works when it eliminates a stable, well-understood, high-volume bottleneck. We use process evidence to identify which automations earn their keep, and which don't.

3.4× ROI on prioritized automations

By the numbers

3.4×

ROI lift when automations are selected from a ranked candidate list

40%

of typical RPA backlogs we recommend not building at all

Stable

automations only: we won't automate noise

What we do

A focused capability, explained without jargon.

Why most automation fails

Many automation programs start by listing tasks and ranking them by hours saved. That misses the bigger picture: automating an unstable, low-volume, or upstream-dependent task creates technical debt, not lift.

  • Stability scoring before ROI scoring
  • Volume and variance thresholds for candidate selection
  • Dependency mapping to upstream and downstream systems
  • Build-vs-buy-vs-don't-automate guidance

Automation as the output, not the input

By the time we recommend automation, we've already proven the underlying process is stable and the bottleneck is real. The automation is the closing move, not the opening one.

  • Automation candidates from validated, ranked constraints
  • Integration mapping across existing systems
  • Hand-off blueprints for RPA, iPaaS, or in-house teams

Tool-agnostic, outcome-anchored

We work alongside whatever tools you already use, RPA platforms, low-code automation tools, or in-house engineering. We don't sell software. We sell outcomes.

What you get

Deliverables built for action, not for the shelf.

Candidate scoring

Every automation candidate scored on stability, volume, ROI, and integration risk.

Build-vs-buy-vs-skip guidance

Practical guidance on which automations are worth building, buying, or leaving alone.

Integration map

Clear specs for how each automation hooks into your existing system landscape.

Hand-off blueprints

Implementation-ready specs for your RPA team or systems integrator.

Tool-agnostic recommendations

We work with whatever automation stack you already have, with no vendor lock-in.

Operational risk review

Every automation flagged for stability, exception rate, and audit considerations.

The Alkhai engagement

Find the bottlenecks your dashboards can't see.

Connect your event data. Within 30 days we deliver your top 5 bottlenecks with ROI attached to every fix. From there it becomes your standing monthly operational intelligence review.

No PII required for scopingNDA-first engagementOutcome-tied pricing available

By day 30

  • Top 5 bottlenecks ranked by financial impact
  • Root cause for each
  • ROI estimate per fix
  • A 30 / 90 / 180-day roadmap

Every month after

  • Full pipeline run against previous month baseline
  • What improved and by how much
  • What didn't move and why
  • Emerging constraints before they become expensive
  • Monthly leadership presentation ready for standup or steering meeting
  • Direct platform access for your team at all times